Printed Editions



Download our Printed Editions
Volume: 1.1 1.2

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Institutional Racism: Alive and Well at Middlebury College

The author has been fired for judgment, conduct and views unbecoming an FYC.

While there are details not present about Luaay's case in this article, it still presents an important perspective on the events that transpired. For better or worse, I chose to focus on Luaay’s removal and the openness of our community. For a more full account of Luaay’s visit check out the Midd-Blog article.

The dialogue surrounding this post has been beautiful. Luaay's case is not the only instance where race and class are implicated in very real ways on campus and in our society. We attend a college whose function is to reproduce the ruling class in an imperialist, white supremacist, patriarchal society. Given the society in which we find ourselves, together we must confront issues of race, class, gender, ability, et cetera to work toward a more just and inclusive community. Share your stories, listen to everyone, engage in dialogue, challenge and grow.

This article was removed between December 1st and 14th, while the my position in the Stewart community was being discussed. Here is the letter that was posted for some of that time. Because it was never my intention to permanently remove this article, here is the original text, returned again to its rightful place in the public forum:

Xenia

      
      And I don’t mean the social house. Xenia is Greek for the concept of guest-friendship. The idea is that you welcome all guests into your home, you feed and house them, and you build lifelong bonds of friendship and connection with them. Xenia is about creating an inclusive community.


     So my friend Luaay has been staying with me for the past week. As I was informed this afternoon, that is in violation of public safety’s guest policy: “A guest of a student may stay in a dormitory no more than three days in any one term.” Surely, Luaay is not the only one to have violated this policy.

      But Luaay’s case is unique in that public safety, without ever having contacted with him, deemed Luaay a "threat to the community" at which point the middlebury police department was called to apprehend him, issuing a No Trespass Order. Some of y’all may have seen him being detained Monday night by five officers in the lobby of davis library. The behavior of middlebury police and the department of public safety officers was consistently condescending and disrespectful towards both Luaay and myself. This appalling behavior continued and was aimed towards other students who subsequently became involved. public safety was not interested in hearing his side of the story; they simply wanted him gone.

      One officer remarked that my friendship with Luaay was “disturbing.” Back in my dorm, gathering Luaay's belongings, middlebury police officers threatened to arrest myself along with three other students, also for trespassing, if we did not "remove Luaay" more expediently.

I have a broken foot. 
I can only move so quickly down four flights of stairs.

     Yet too much attention to my own condition distracts from the larger context. What one needs to be conscious of is how race and class play into this. Is Luaay, a large, dark-skinned, dreadlocked male, who is "unvetted" by our admissions committee, somehow outside our community norms enough to draw such an aggressive response? How secure are the members of our community who also fit into one, two, or three of Luaay's descriptors? Would he have been so forcibly evicted if he were a wealthy or white friend of mine? Can you imagine a situation in which such a friend might be considered “a danger” to the community? I certainly cannot. 

Whom do we welcome into our community and whom do we call the police on? 
This is surely a question that must be addressed. 

This is not the way we treat members of our community. 
This is not the way we treat our guests.


-So-crates

23 comments:

  1. I don't get it... “A guest of a student may stay in a dormitory no more than three days in any one term.” Weren't you and your friend consciously breaking this rule? Isn't this the normal procedure when this rule is breached?

    As far as I know, the police are condescending and disrespectful towards everyone. This isn't right, but I don't why race is a part of this discussion. I'd be careful not to make serious allegations like this based on a connection that may seem logical to you (i.e. he got hassled by police because he's tall, dark-skinned and dreadlocked, not because he broke the rules), but that wouldn't even occur to most of us. Rules were broken and the authorities responded.

    Institutional racism? Please

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the bigger issue is that guest rules are regularly broken, and largely unenforced. This is widely understood to be the case by most Middlebury students, many of whom regularly take advantage of it.

    Your criticism is furthermore problematic on a number of levels.

    1) You say that the racial aspect of this incident isn't readily evident to you (question: did you think admitting your ignorance would help make a point? Could it be a facet of your own privilege?)

    2) The Middlebury Police are only allowed on campus when Public Safety asks them to do so. ACTUALLY, THE STANDARD PROCEDURE when a student breaks the rules is to inform them via the established institutional channels- i.e Commons Dean, Administration members, Director of public safety. How about an email, letter or a phone call?

    3) If as far as you know, "the police are condescending and disrespectful towards everyone" you live a very sheltered or jaded existence my friend. This is obviously not the case, especially in homogeneous communities- i.e- rural VT. Take a look at statistics on police brutality or go look at the gentrification process in NY.

    Naivety is a shame. At least you care to check out this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wholeheartedly agree with the comment above by Matt Birnbaum. The anonymous writer above has completely missed the point. There are members of this campus who I know personally that have visitors here for over a month and they don't get so much as an email. Why? Is it because their friends look like the majority of Middkids do and are therefore snuck under the radar? Should this be accepted?
    Secondly, having five Middlebury Police officers arrive with a No Trespass Order having issued NO PRIOR warning through the standard procedures Matt mentioned above is NOT "normal procedure when a rule is breached".
    Thirdly, why is there such blatant inconsistency in the regulation of said rules? How can soooo many people get away with it yet the ONE person who is caught just happens to be black and dreadlocked? If you could look outside of the narrow framework of the blatant privilege exhibited in your post, you might realize that there are injustices that slap you in the face and should not be ignored.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're forgetting to mention that Luaay exposed himself to a couple of young ladies in the Stewart common room when he urinated in a cup rather than using the nearby restroom. Public Safety has a responsibility to protect the Middlebury College community, and they were absolutely right in removing someone that behaved so inappropriately.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is not appropriate for you, an FYC, to invite a homeless man that you met two weeks ago to live with you and the freshmen you are entrusted to protect. He displayed poor judgement on at least two occasions and you still defend your decision. Not to mention, it smelled like he hadnt showered in weeks. All of Stew 4 smelled horrible, despite the best efforts of the custodial staff, for the length of his stay.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This conversation and many like it loses its value and legitimacy when the extreme right battles the extreme left over and over. Yes, it is perhaps not a coincidence that the only reinforcement of this rule by the MPD was towards a "tall, black, dreadlocked" visitor. This being said, by NO means is the second anonymous poster "privileged" for displaying the other side of the argument. In fact, if anyone did their research, they would find that (if the accusations about the guest exposing himself are indeed true) the MPD had justified reasoning to remove him from campus as quickly as possible. So yes, in this light, it was a simple case of police removing someone who broke the rule(s). The anonymous writer you refer to, Rachael C, has not completely missed the point. They simply presented another view, without which there would be no conversation. Just because they are missing YOUR point does not make him (or her) privileged.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey So-crates,

    Did Pub Safe / Midd police say he was taken away because he was accused of indecent exposure in a common room or solely because he was there for more than three days? I understand that the manner in which Luaay was removed was reprehensible and that all of this wouldn't have happened if he looked like I do, but the piece that the anonymous poster just wrote about indecent exposure is a detail that you didn't mention. Is that poster just spewing bullshit?

    Best,
    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is not a battle of extreme right vs extreme left and such inappropriate labeling is as counterproductive as what it strives to describe.
    In NOT being an extremist and searching for answers, I requested a meeting with the Director of Public Safety who is also the Associate Dean of the College and more information was divulged as to why the situation occurred as it did.
    There were indeed reports of indecent exposure within the residence halls that are NOT CONCLUSIVE. The exposure reported was done while in the shower. However, the concern had been raised and public safety was required to investigate.
    In doing so, they received "information" from the host student that soon after was proven to be "misinformation". This deliberate dishonesty towards Public Safety increased concern further.
    Lastly, after conversations with the host student as well as the Dean and other residents of the freshman building, Public Safety deemed it necessary to issue a No Trespass order. When they went to the residence hall to issue it and escort the guest off-campus (as per protocol), they were informed that the guest was not on campus and had gone in to town. Due to the issuance of the order being effective immediately, the Middlebury Police were summoned to assist in the search of the guest in order for him to be apprehended and not stay another night. The Director was surprised to hear that five MP officers arrived at the scene and she agreed that this was not necessary (she also mentioned that not much crime happens in Middlebury so when they have nothing to do they all jump on the first incident that arrives; this is what I find most appalling due to the intimidation caused by their presence). MP arrived at Davis Library, which is open to the public and therefore considered part of the town, where the found the guest and issued the order.

    The Director was adamant that the only reason the Middlebury Police got involved was due to the guest not being on campus when Public Safety attempted to issue the order. Had he been in Stewart, the MP would not have been involved.

    The other major concern was the lack of information related to this guest. The host knew very little about his guest and had known him for a short period of time. The guest had no connection to an identifiable community and provided only a first name. All these factors add to the concerns that arose within the department of Public Safety when reports were received that residents were uncomfortable with the presence of the guest in the residence hall.

    The meeting with the Director was very productive and not "extreme" at all. I am very appreciative of the information divulged and I hope it can set to rest that this was a purely racially motivated incident. I am not in a position to say whether this incident had any racial fueling or motivation.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Kudos to Rachel. Just so you guys know, the shower incident and the incident of him exposing himself to young ladies are actually separate events that both did indeed occur.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Kudos to Rachel for seeking out the truth. However, I must say, and call me stupid here, but I'm missing the connection between the majority of her post and where the conclusion, "I hope it can set to rest that this was a purely racially motivated incident," comes from. Did she not claim that the small-town vibe of the Midd PD could be to blame for the overwhelming approach? Is it ignorant to think that this could actually be true? I mean, do you think that five Midd PD officers really got up out of their chairs and said, "We are going to need our whole unit to solve this threat!" simply because of Luaay's racial identity? How many times on this campus have we seen two police cruisers and 4 officers reprehending some poor upperclassmen at the traffic circle after he stumbles out of Two Brothers? It seems that any other example of the police department over-staffing a situation here would serve to disprove the racial basis of this story.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rachel C., please take a breath and chill out. As anonymous said above me, you present a great argument as to why this was NOT a racially motivated act but then conclude with, in fact, that it was. Laughable, if not embarrassing. If anything, the Midd PD were the people who responded in the incorrect way with 5 officers showing up at the library. Please, do us all a favor and take up your issue with them.

    Middlebury tried to go through the correct procedures in letting the Middlebury student know that this student was no longer welcome on campus. What more do you want Middlebury College (aka public safety) to do? If this was a white student who "exposed" himself do you think Pub Safe would have acted differently? NO, they wouldn't. The same steps would have been taken and the rando would have been removed from campus.

    Please, calm down.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think she concluded that it wasn't necessarily a racially motivated incident in the last sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah she did. By saying, " I hope it can set to rest that this was a purely racially motivated incident," she means that now she understands that the incident was not racially motivated. Leave her alone! She did a great job by taking this seriously and informing herself.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, my reading comprehension is terrible. "Laughable, if not embarrassing."

    Apologies, Rachel C.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I found the guest's couchsurfing page: http://www.couchsurfing.org/people/luaay

    The page reveals that he is not homeless (he lives in Vancouver). It also indicates that he does not own a phone, which possibly caused some confusion for Pub Safe.

    I think Middlebury has seriously mishandled the incident up to this point. It seems to me that race and class were among the factors that influenced the college's response.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Having lived in a town of 7000, I can assure you that it is not unusual for ALL three of the officers to show up at once on any call.

    ReplyDelete
  19. ^Watch out making excuses for cops here, dude. Some of these writers will nab you with an information overload. You should try thinking in a broader context than it seems you are.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Here is a statement than appeared while the post was down:

    Dear Friends,

    The author of this "removed" article referenced below, Barrett Smith, had requested his post be taken down last week. In accordance with our very open and quite transparent mission statement the GADFLY respected his wish do so, as we choose not to operate under any silly notion of hierarchy or position herein. It has been down since Dec 1st.

    However, our belief in openness and unfiltered freedom of expression can also pose significant issues, in this case both personal and emotional. Many comments below were made without having the burden of journalistic proof- unavoidable given the way this blog is run, and wholly self aware of that reality. Yet such is not the function of the GADFLY, although it was unfortunate Barrett was not more forthcoming strictly for the sake of openness and better dialogue. This is not to suggest his claims were not critical, necessary, and relate to real concerns. His choice of words in this forum is, at the very least, certainly understandable given that he was under investigation and risked being fired. This power dynamic will generally create pressure in any capitalist operation, that of owner vs. worker.

    Understandable, relevant and topical. Most importantly worthy of our defense. Reflect, or read some Hegel. Take a bath. Seek out questions.


    the GADFLY asks that concerned parties continue to voice their own opinions in the coming weeks., Many students have already begun writing in.

    One should welcome additional compositions from anyone who believes otherwise too.


    In Solidarity and Coffee,

    the GADFLY

    ReplyDelete
  21. Whoever has ear to hear what really happened in Middleberry college last November will be happy to hear the view of the whole situation from a main character, an“older man”,a culprit of the whole thing Luaay Elamir.

    “Beware of those who found the truth.Trust those who constantly seek it”


    The main reason why I “violated extended stay of more then three days”in student dorm for which Barret was targeted thus formally excusably punished for was that I suffered from bronchitis.I almost got over it (it was in a last stage then),only to be kicked out by police on the street in a middle of a cold night.But,of course why would anyone care where tall,black dreadlocked stranger with bronchitis will spend nite on minus X degrees or so.
    No,I am not homeless as some classified me,I simply stayed that long for the reason above as well as for enjoying company of Barret,his friends and some other people.
    Even if I was homeless,so what?I noticed how in American sick and twisted society being homeless is tolerated less then being corrupted politician or ruthless law enforcement official.Americans need to be educated that NOBODY asked or wanted to become homeless.I am shocked how many Americans in fact believe exactly that.
    This is why police on November 21.2011,on night of eviction suspecting I am homeless,on the top of being black with dreads treated me as trash,not letting me say anything in my defence.It is so clear for the reasons of racism and classism why I was not given benefit of a doubt.The officers who shamelessly taunted me of being homeless also reprimanded me for trimming my hair in a male bathroom.Normal people anywhere on a planet but in America do not see neither of those actions as questionable behaviour or a crime.I have seen more world then those officers and campus people did and they ever will,yet in their eyes,somehow I am worth less.If this is not racism what is it?Actually,when I think about how it was socially acceptable up to 1961.in your country to shoot black person if they dare to drink from the facet labeled”whites only”I shouldn’t be surprised and expect justice with apologizes and flowers on it.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Now,let me address some other accusations against me:Urinating in a cup occurred but I was discreet and can easily prove that girls haven't seen anything inappropriate,in fact they ASSUMED what I was doing by observing me ,spying on me from the distance.Here is the proof:Let a wise,dedicated,researcher of the truth talk to those girls and ask them,whether they seen my penis.If they honor the truth,their answer will most likely be’no. But,everybody knows that it wont even come to that point,because pissing in a cup it s not an issue here,it is only an excuse.Those girls wouldn’t even be willing to give public,signed testimony if asked to.It is easier to rely and cover the whole thing with a blanket of rumours,removing a foreign body out with no through investigation and continue living as happy shiny family as if nothing had happened.
    Guess what? I personally witnessed white guy pissing on a wall of your campus.He wasn’t shy,discreet at all.So if I would give you his description I bet nobody will go look for him,am I correct?Even if he gets caught the maximum he would get is slap on a wrist,this is impression I have by reading Middlebery college blog posts that are concerning incident involving myself
    This Middleberry experience is not unique for me in my travels across America.Not at all.I had worst.But this is what characterizes your country:fear,racism,classism,paranoia,hypocrisy,discrimination,imperialism among others are the ID of your country USA.Not to be mistaken,every country has problems and its own issues,but is it the accident that I constantly went through this crap while being guest in your country?How come I haven't gone through this as much or at all while I was in Russia,Europe,Cuba and some other”rogue states”?

    ReplyDelete
  23. I saw how nowhere else but in America society suffers from disease called:”political corretness”and when you try to enforce it,you fail even harder.And then you start disgusting yourself being aware that victim didn’t buy your sense of justice and you yourself don’t believe in it,unless it is applicable to yourself only,but then it s not called “justice,equality, democracy”,and other cheap US led propaganda slogans,it is something else,it s called dictatorship and fascism.

    Double standards are nothing new,however be aware that big politics originates in mentality of small ordinary citizens,their thinking,their mindshape;therefore they have no excuse of not being accountable for what their country does and how it treats their own citizens including foreign citizens in America as well as foreign citizens abroad whom US troops helped to be occupied,enslaved or ethnicaly cleansed.For instance US war planes bombed Vietnam decades ago to its core back to stone age.As a cause effect today number of vietnamese infants are born mutulated with all kinds of birth defects,thanks to chemicals used in US”freedom bombs”delivered to sovereign nation of Vietnam.So,why am I not surprised when in conversation with most if not all American citizens I encounter,there is feeling of justification for droping atomic bomb on Japan and destruction of Vietnam?How many Americans object the fact that even up to today’s date US government refuses to call war in Vietnam by its right name”war”,but rather chooses softer term:”containment”.There is obvious match between US government policy and mentality of ordinary US citizens.

    If you let this incident slide,not inspecting it with magnifying glass,not calling it by its right name,sooner or later you become accustomed to it,treating it as something normal and acceptable and that is dangerous.
    America fears strangers and foreigners for the simple reason of its bloody heritage and crimes committed in the past and in present,all over the world.From psychological point of view it is easy to explain it,just look at the average killer,he thinks everybody else is killer and will go after him/her.Such person fears its own shadow.Well,the sooner you guys get the cure for your paranoia you will have easier time with yourself and with others as well.When you travel abroad you wont have to fear being American or being hated,sewing Canadian flags on your backpacks etc.The way to reach that state are people such as Barret Smith with good reputation,sharp mind,bright ideas,descent moral,lovely spirit ,but instead of elevating them and uplifting them you put them down with humiliating and unjust dismissal from their public positions.It makes me think America hasn’t learn anything from its past.


    Luaay Elamir
    February 10, 2012

    Full time professional nomad
    Travel journalist
    Freelance writer,critizer
    Student of life

    ReplyDelete